Post by account_disabled on Feb 28, 2024 8:32:43 GMT
Not "That terrorism in the basque country will definitively disappear", and then asks about the influence , on the decision made by eta, of these factors: the mobilizations of rejection of violence, the peace process in northern ireland, police action, the conviction that the most effective way is democratic, the psoe-pp anti-terrorist pact, judicial action, and pressure on eta from the nationalist left. Which political party has done the most? More specific and intentional is question 19, which says: “in your opinion, which political party has done the most to end eta terrorism? It is added as a note that the response must be “spontaneous.” and a gap appears for a party name to be given. There is also the “none” option. Next, it is asked “which of the following institutions do you think has contributed the most to ending eta terrorism? The response options are, in this order: the government of spain, the government of the basque country, the national police, the ertzaintza, the civil guard, the judges, the prosecutors, other (which one?). “if the total abandonment of its terrorist activity is confirmed, do you believe that the governments of spain and france should dialogue with eta about the future of its prisoners and militants?” says the next question. The possible answers are: yes, no.
General amnesty for eta prisoners? The questionnaire proposes possible measures to benefit eta members , “if this abandonment of eta's terrorist activity is confirmed,” and asks which of them you would agree with very, quite a bit, little to Special Database not at all. The specific benefits he cites are, in this order: bringing eta prisoners closer to the basque country, granting eta prisoners prison benefits just like the rest of the prisoners, “granting individual pardons to eta prisoners who do not have crimes of blood”, “grant individual pardons to eta prisoners even if they have blood crimes, “grant a general amnesty to eta prisoners”. The next question asks whether “ the militants of this organization should continue to be detained and tried for pending cases” (the answer is yes, no). The subsequent question asks if, if the abandonment of terrorist activity is confirmed, “generous measures should be applied to eta militants who voluntarily surrender to the authorities”, with these options: “yes”, “yes, as long as they do not have pending blood crimes”, “no, in no case”. And a self-determination referendum? Question number 20 goes one step further.
He says like this: “and as some nationalist parties in the basque country propose, do you believe that it would be possible to consider, in a future of complete peace, holding a referendum on self-determination for the basque country?” the answers are: yes, no. Next, the cis asks if eta's statement will have an influence on the result of the general elections on november 20 , and which political party or group it believes will benefit, to a greater extent, from eta's statement in those elections. He then proposes which party has the greatest capacity “to manage the end of eta well” (spontaneous response), and whether, with the new situation created by the statement, “all political parties of the so-called abertzale left” should be legalized. The last question in relation to these issues demands how decisions about eta are to be made from now on . With these possible answers: exclusively by the party that is in government, by agreement between the party in government and the main opposition party, by consensus between the majority of the parties with parliamentary representation, by agreement between the government of spain and the government of the basque autonomous community.